Day 3 Recap: Judge Amy Coney Barrett Handles Democrats’ Desperate Partisan Attacks With Grace

Day 3 Recap: Judge Amy Coney Barrett Handles Democrats’ Desperate Partisan Attacks With Grace

Judge Barrett handled Senate Democrats’ desperate partisan attacks with grace, showing the American people exactly why she’s uniquely qualified to serve on the Supreme Court.

October 14, 2020

As if it wasn’t made obvious over the past three days, Judge Amy Coney Barrett has proven herself to have the qualifications and judicial temperament to serve on the highest court in the land.

The third day of Senate Judiciary Committee hearings was much like the previous two. Judge Barrett eloquently answered the member’s questions – even when they happened to be incoherent or absurd. Here are a few highlights:

Senator Diane Feinstein expressed how “impressed” she was with Judge Barret’s explanation of a legal term known as severability:

Senator Kamala Harris was rebuked for desperately trying to get Judge Barrett to break with historical precedent by asking leading questions related to public policy:

Senator Chris Coons was exposed for continually insinuating Judge Barrett wasn’t an independent thinker:

Judge Barrett’s flawless performance was also reflected in a new Morning Consult poll, which found the majority of Americans believed the Senate should vote to confirm her. With no third round planned, a committee vote on her confirmation will be set up for October 22.

Bottom line: Judge Barrett handled Senate Democrats’ desperate partisan attacks with grace, showing the American people exactly why she’s uniquely qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. Her measured, thoughtful responses should serve as a template for future nominees and ensure that she’s confirmed in a timely manner.

Stay up to date